Freedom GPT and Claude AI are two of the most talked about artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots that have been released recently.
Both claim to be more beneficial to society than previous chatbots, but they have some key differences in their capabilities and the philosophy behind their development. This article will provide an in-depth comparison of Freedom GPT and Claude AI to understand their unique selling points.
Background on AI Chatbots
AI chatbots have become increasingly popular over the past few years as the technology has advanced to a point where conversations feel quite natural. Chatbots like Google’s Meena and Alexa aim to be helpful personal assistants, while creative chatbots like Anthropic’s Claude focus more on harmless, honest conversations.
With the release of chatbots like OpenAI’s GPT-3 and more recently, Freedom GPT, there are renewed concerns about the risks of generative AI that can produce increasingly human-like text.
The non-profit Anthropic specifically designed Claude to address these risks by focusing on safety during training. Understanding the capabilities and limitations designed into these two latest chatbots provides insight into current priorities in AI development.
Comparing Freedom GPT and Claude
Development History and Release
Freedom GPT was created by a startup called Anthropic as an extension of their Constitutional AI assistant, Claude. Anthropic calls Claude a “self-aware AI assistant focused on being helpful, harmless, and honest.”
This focus stems from Anthropic’s mission statement on developing AI responsibly and ethically. Claude was first released in April 2022.
Freedom GPT is trained based on publicly available data as of 2021 rather than the internet up until 2022 like Claude. As it is not as constrained as Claude, Freedom GPT aims to offer more creativity and longer conversational abilities in its responses. Freedom GPT moved into private beta testing in December 2022.
Safety and Capabilities
As a “constitutional AI”, safety is core to Claude’s development. Its responses are carefully designed not to be toxic or provide dangerous medical/legal advice. Freedom GPT does not share these constraints, which likely allows it more range to respond creatively but increases certain risks from misinformation or offensive content.
Anthropic has focused intensive research on techniques like conversational tone indicators to help Claude understand context and mitigate harmful responses. The Freedom GPT team highlights allowing more creative freedom as an asset, countering that harmful output remains relatively low. But some experts argue more safety constraints are still needed for such generative AI.
As capabilities evolve, Claude seems more narrowly focused on harmless assistance while Freedom GPT targets broader applications like rivaling the creativity potential of other generative AI like GPT-3. But advanced skills like writing long-form articles still seem to favor Claude’s safety-focused design.
Transparency
Given growing concerns over AI ethics and misinformation, transparency about chatbots’ capabilities to users builds trust and understanding. As a non-profit focused on AI safety, Anthropic has emphasized transparency as core to their Constitutional AI efforts under development like Claude.
Freedom GPT has emerged from a startup environment more typical for Silicon Valley AI. The company talks about transparency mostly regarding model capabilities rather than the training process or ethical priorities. As Freedom GPT aims to offer GPT-3 style creativity benefits beyond Claude’s scope, this more limited transparency could leave some users cautious.
Pricing and Availability
As a startup aiming to sell its AI services, Freedom GPT has unsurprisingly not released public pricing yet. Initial reports suggest pricing may be similar to GPT-3 which runs from a few cents per 1,000 character response to a few dollars. Significantly more capable Pro tiers for GPT-3 cost hundreds of dollars per month. But final, publicly published pricing will provide clarity.
As a non-profit research lab, Anthropic offers free limited trials of Claude and has discussed eventual paid tiers primarily to sustain operations rather than profit significantly. The Constitutional nature and transparency of Claude appeals to many users. But the effectiveness of current capabilities against advanced market offerings has been critiqued by some as well.
Conclusion and Future Outlook
It’s an interesting moment in time when new AI chatbots emerge with distinctly different philosophical priorities guiding their development – either maximizing creative potential or focusing primarily on safety. Both approaches have merits and limitations that should appease some users while frustrating those with different expectations.
Much still remains unknown about real-world capabilities for average users and just how transparent pricing will prove to be. But what does seem clear is that priorities like safety, ethics and transparency will likely play an increasing role in driving adoption and trust as AI continues advancing at a rapid pace.
Claude represents a carefully constrained vanguard aiming to build understanding and assurance that AI can grow responsibly before expanding abilities. Freedom GPT provides a bold countervision more reminiscent of Silicon Valley norms chasing astonishing capabilities first while assessing risks as more of an afterthought.
Ultimately there’s a pressing need for debate within both the AI community and general public on what we truly want and don’t want from increasingly ubiquitous and capable AI systems. Only through setting better norms and incentives around safety and ethics can we steer towards an AI future we actually want rather than where short-term financial motivations alone take us.
FAQs
What are Freedom GPT and Claude AI?
Freedom GPT and Claude AI are two new AI chatbots that can have conversations, answer questions, and generate text on demand. Freedom GPT is made by Anthropic with a focus on creativity, while their first chatbot Claude is a “Constitutional AI” that prioritizes safety and transparency.
How do Freedom GPT and Claude compare in terms of ability and safety?
Claude has more safety restrictions on the types of conversations it can have and advice it can give, making it less prone to generating misinformation or toxic text. Freedom GPT doesn’t have as many restrictions so it may converse more naturally, but also runs a higher risk of problematic outputs.
What data were they trained on?
Claude was trained on internet data up until early 2021, while Freedom GPT used public data up until 2022. This may make Freedom GPT better at discussing recent events.
How do they compare in terms of creativity and use cases?
Freedom GPT aims to replicate capabilities like prose generation and more flexible conversations seen with models like GPT-3. Claude’s capabilities are focused more narrowly around harmless assistance rather than creative applications.
How do their pricing structures compare?
Specific Freedom GPT pricing isn’t available yet, but early reports suggest it may be in-line with GPT-3’s pay-per-word model at a few cents/dollars per 1,000 character response. As a non-profit research project, Claude trials have been free and paid tiers will aim more for sustainability than profit.
Which chatbot is considered more transparent?
As a Constitutional AI focused on responsible progress in AI, Claude and its creators have emphasized transparency far more than Freedom GPT, which has followed a more typical startup approach focused on capabilities first.
What are experts most excited or concerned about for each?
Experts are excited for Freedom GPT’s potential to match other advanced generative AI capabilities while concerned about its lack of safety measures and transparency. Claude’s safety-first approach earns praise but its constraints on abilities frustrate some users.
