As an Angular expert with over 10 years of experience building complex web applications, I find that UI libraries are essential for rapidly constructing modern web app user interfaces. While Angular provides the foundational framework and development workflows, UI libraries deliver pre-packaged components for common UI patterns needed in every app – tables, menus, data entry forms, etc. Their pre-built responsive components accelerate development timelines and provide out-of-the-box functionality for everything from date pickers to tree views.
However, with dozens of Angular UI libraries now available, selecting the right set of libraries for your app can be challenging. Over the next 3000 words, I‘ll share my expert wisdom to help you make sense of the crowded Angular UI ecosystem…
The Value of Leveraging UI Libraries
Before diving into specific library analysis, let‘s first review the why behind Angular UI libraries…
1. Save Time with Functional Components
UI libraries provide pre-built implementations of every common UI component – tables, menus, modals, tabs, accordions, and 100+ more. This eliminates the need to hand craft these time-consuming elements from scratch. Given that around 50-70% of code in web apps focuses on UI, this directly accelerates development velocity.
2. Consistent Look and Interactions
Following established UI libraries promotes consistency in layout, style, animations, accessibility, and UX interactions. Rather than every engineer implementing their own vision, reusable libraries align teams to standardized components.
3. Robust Browser Support
Vetted libraries handle critical browser compatibility issues around CSS prefixes, JavaScript environments, responsive layouts, and accessibility across devices. Building this robust browser support in house requires significant effort.
4. Accessibility Challenges Solved
Modern UI libraries embed accessibility best practices such as ARIA attributes, color contrast ratios, keyboard navigation, and screen reader support. This simplifies compliance for highly regulated industries.
5. Device and Touch Support
Leading libraries ensure components gracefully adapt to phones, tablets, and desktop experiences with easy responsive API options. Touch events and gestures are also handled reliably.
6. Established Community Adoption
Given their popularity, issues are quickly fixed in publicly shared libraries. Their momentum indicates they will be maintained over the long term compared to custom internal solutions.
As evidenced above, leveraging Angular UI libraries gives teams a head start on development with industry best practice implementations for every user interface requirement. But how do we comprehensively evaluate and compare solutions given so many alternatives?
Comparing Angular UI Components
As an Angular expert who has built UIs using nearly every major library, I consider several key dimensions when assessing options:
Functionality Fit – The breadth, depth, and uniqueness of components matching required UI patterns
Look and Feel – The visual styling and interactivity model – is it appealing and appropriate?
Performance – The runtime efficiency and network payload size to deliver a responsive experience, especially on mobile
Accessibility – How well keyboard, screen reader, and ARIA accessibility guidelines are supported
Browser Support – The library‘s strategy for handling browser compatibility pain points
Mobile/Responsive – Layout fluidity across device sizes along with touch and gesture support
Bundle Size – The additional JavaScript payload size for the library code itself
Learning Curve – How difficult is the library to learn, integrate, and master for developers
Customization – Ability to bend and mold components to meet exact design needs
Licensing – What usage terms are enforced? Are paid commercial licenses required?
Given these assessment criteria, let me share expert insights on leading Angular UI libraries…
Angular Material
As Google‘s officially supported component library, Angular Material enjoys strong market adoption and confidence in its long-term viability. With over 60 robust components engineered around Google‘s Material Design spec, it delivers an excellent table stakes enterprise UI foundation out of the box.
For functionality, Angular Material excels at:
- Business data displays via tables and grids
- Professional form controls like autocomplete
- Modals, popups, tabs, and alerts
- Responsive menu patterns
It falls slightly short on more advanced visualizations like Gantt charts along with niche patterns for medical, finance or other vertical domains.
From a visual perspective, Material Design promotes liberal use of whitespace, flat colors, and flowing round interactions. For some brands, this works well. Others may prefer more conservative, traditional interfaces vs the opinionated Material aesthetic.
As Google‘s official offering built by Angular‘s core team, component quality and developer experience is excellent. The library loads quickly, even with large datasets, and was built mobile-first for responsive experiences. The APIs also feel instantly familiar for experienced Angular developers.
The main tradeoff is larger JavaScript bundle sizes – over 2MB minified for the complete library. This heft is due to the sophisticated component implementations. For simple CRUD apps, it may feel heavy, but Material truly shines for more complex enterprise experiences.
Overall, Angular Material is a safe, future-proof choice that can meet 80%+ of application needs for minimal risks.
ngBootstrap – Lightweight Bootstrap Delivery
For teams already comfortable with Bootstrap styling, ngBootstrap offers a smooth transition path. It reimplements 100+ native Bootstrap components without jQuery dependencies, aligning closely with default Bootstrap markup and CSS class names.
Think accordions, modal dialogs, navbars, tabs, carousels and any other typical Bootstrap pattern – ngBootstrap delivers. As an officially supported Angular project, code quality and stability is excellent.
Visually ngBootstrap hews very closely to stock Bootstrap for a comfortable, approachable feel. Custom theming is light requiring just SASS edits. Performance is blazing fast due to minimalist, simple component authoring. Payloads also weigh much less than Angular Material.
The main downside of ngBootstrap is lack of richer, more advanced components. For standard application needs, it delivers efficiently. But for more custom interfaces, teams will need to build additional components.
So if you want great performance with standard Bootstrap v4 styling in Angular, check out ngBootstrap. It‘s a lightweight yet capable option.
Clarity Design System
Backed by VMWare, Clarity offers another open-source alternative focused on data-rich enterprise application patterns. While lighter at around 30 components, Clarity emphasizes grids, tables, visualization and forms for data-centric web apps.
For admin consoles, inventory dashboards, analytical interfaces and line-of-business apps, Clarity shines. The integrated visual language looks consistently clean and modern – assuming that aesthetic matches your needs. Performance also feels snappy even for datasets with 1000+ rows.
Documentation is stellar with live examples for every use case. APIs promote accessibility and responsive layouts are built-in. For enterprise apps, Clarity holds its own against heavier alternatives. It‘s also MIT licensed to enable unlimited usage.
The main gaps are less breadth in component variety vs Angular Material and less configurability than paid offerings. But for open-source enterprise needs out of the box, check out Clarity.
PrimeNG – Impressive Premium Components
PrimeNG from PrimeTek surprised me with the most diverse premium component offering overall. With 65+ flexible components including grids, trees, timelines, editors and even Kanban boards, PrimeNG brings welcome specialization.
The components excel at data visualization for admin dashboards. For niche use cases like scheduling, gamification or organograms, PrimeNG likely offers relevant building blocks. Top notch demos give visibility into every feature along with source code.
From an aesthetic perspective, styling leans more enterprise versus consumer but also avoids the starkness of traditional libraries like Kendo or DevExtreme. Definitely sufficient for LoB apps.
For theming, 15 SASS-based theme options are included with full customization available. Performance feels snappy for the sophisticated capabilities. Licenses are Apache 2.0 almost enabling usage.
Downsides are fewer integrations so far into 3rd party frameworks like Jest or Storybook. But teams wanting richer premium components for internal apps put PrimeNG high on the list.
Kendo UI – Performance Powerhouse
Representing top-tier commercial offerings, KendoReact from Telerik delivers unmatched breadth, polish and performance. With over 180 components covering grids, charts, editors and even barcode scanners, Kendo UI brings jaw-dropping enterprise functionality.
The components excel at financial and healthcare interfaces given support for time series, real-time data and advanced analytics. Scheduling and planning components are also best in class.
For teams needing pixel perfect interfaces, obsessive performance up to 20X over jQuery, and bespoke components, Kendo shines. Extensive globalization support for LTR and RTL languages also shows attention to detail.
Given its commercial nature, pricing starts at $999 per developer annually. But the components, documentation, performance and support demonstrate the premium value.
Downsides are mainly the learning curve and higher cost. But evaluators report frequently choosing Kendo UI over competitors for enterprise-grade capabilities.
So for many internal LoB apps, Kendo UI delivers Cadillac quality.
Ant Design – Chinese Styling Sensibilities
Originating from libraries at Ant Financial and Alibaba, Ant Design brings graceful Chinese aesthetics to Angular UIs. Amid dozens of components, the attention goes into smooth animations, reactive layouts and gesutre support.
For teams wanting an alternative to the Western Realism styling of Bootstrap/Material Design, Ant Design feels breezy. Quick prototyping benefits from quality documentation and a responsive grid. Performance also shines over 2G mobile connections common in Asia.
Downsides are fewer complex components for enterprises. But for consumergrade experiences where elegance matters, Ant Design should be shortlisted.
More Great Options
Beyond these leading alternatives, here are more Angular UI libraries I recommend considering:
Covalent – suite of responsive components compiled from Angular Material optimized for enterprise dashboards
NgZorro – Ant Design from Alibaba re-implemented for Angular with graceful animations and layouts
Onsen UI – focused on hybrid mobile apps with smooth gestures and transitions
Telerik – mature suite for complex business apps
Webix – specialized data grid and visualization components
Quasar – batteries included mobile-first framework
And over a dozen other quality options…
The hardest part is narrowing the field – not finding enough choices!
Expert Tips for Getting Started
When embarking on integrating Angular UI libraries, here are best practices I recommend:
Audit Your Functionality Gaps
Catalog all the UI screens and components required for your application. Identify areas not covered by Angular out of the box to build your wishlist.
Shortlist Visual Options for Evaluation
Based on functionality needs, curate 2-3 libraries for deeper hands-on review. Code up some prototypes of key screens leveraging the options.
Assess Performance with Real Data
Load up demo apps with realistic data sets and users to validate speed and responsiveness. Sort columns, page through table results, load new modal data – asses possible performance pinch points.
Check Browser and Device Coverage
Using tools like CrossBrowserTesting, validate components in target desktop, tablet and mobile sizes. Click around on touch devices to ensure a natural feel.
Start with Mock Styling for Rapid Iteration
To accelerate prototyping, use basic CSS or bootstrap for styling at first. Focus engineering on functionality not colors. Swap styled components later as the UI matures.
Architect Library Layer as Separate Module
Keep your application code isolated from UI libraries for easier upgrades. Encapsulate into a separate Angular feature module that gets imported.
The Bottom Line
Hopefully this overview dispels any trepidation around leveraging Angular component libraries.
- Lean on Angular Material when you want integrated standards that handle 80% of needs
- Choose Clarity for open-source, data-rich enterprise interfaces
- Switch to PrimeNG or Kendo UI for niche premium use cases
- Prefer Ant Design for apps needing Chinese influenced aesthetics
I‘m confident you can now make an informed choice for your next Angular UI project. Reach out with any other questions!
John the Angular Expert
){kind=link}